June 15, 2008
Sorry to be posting like, every hour this weekend. This half-hour special on AMC is really fun. It’s showing at all kinds of odd times throughout the month. I was sure I also read that, starting tomorrow, you could watch it on AMC.com, but now I can’t find that in writing.
It’s nicely grouped clips, and discussion with the cast (Hamm, Slattery and Kartheiser on the boys’ side (literally), and Moss, Jones and Hendricks on the girls’. And then Weiner finally chimes in.
This manages to be a very exciting promo piece with minimal spoilage.
June 6, 2008
Posted by Deborah Lipp under Awards
, Media Talk
| Tags: Damages
, John Slattery
, Jon Hamm
, LA Times
, Salt Lake Tribune
, The Envelope
, Tom O'Neill
, Vincent Kartheiser
At The Envelope (the awards-centric section of the LA Times), Tom O’Neill compiles a roundup of nomination predictions. This is a discussion of which shows, among the top ten favorites already selected, will get one of the five nominations for Best Dramatic series. Polling five TV critics, and offering his own predictions, only three shows get unanimous agreement: Mad Men, House, and Damages.
At the Salt Lake Tribune, Vince Horiuchi discusses his own ballot.
Never has my hand been more sure than when marking a check next to “Mad Men,” AMC’s sterling first entry into original programming.
Variety interviews Jon Hamm, as part of a series on Emmy contenders.
…and our commenter kartheiser_grl hooked us up with another Variety article, this one about John Slattery and Vincent Kartheiser, focused on actors in Emmy contention for supporting roles.
May 4, 2008
Yesterday, May 3rd, was Christina Hendricks. (And it was a big one and I missed it!)
Today, May 4th, Deborah Lipp.
Tomorrow, May 5th, Vincent Kartheiser.
Three of the greatest pouts in all of show business.
Kisses to all.
April 26, 2008
AMC reports that Vincent Kartheiser will be receiving a Young Hollywood Award tomorrow (Sunday) night.
The awards are sponsored by Hollywood Life Magazine; the “official site” for the awards doesn’t mention Kartheiser, or indeed, much about the awards in any kind of organized fashion. It’s just some breathless gossip about “up-and-coming “it” stars in tinseltown…” GODS, do people really still say “Tinseltown”? Without capitalizing it? Anyway, this is why it sucks to be a blogger, these people are not designing their sites for me to figure stuff out. So thanks to AMC for the info.
January 17, 2008
Posted by Deborah Lipp under Actor Talk
| Tags: Adam Kaufman
, Andy Umberger
, Angel: The Series
, Buffy the Vampire Slayer
, Christina Hendricks
, Dr. Wayne
, Golden Globes
, Indian Summer
, Parker Abrams
, Vincent Kartheiser
Whedonesque, your source for all things Whedon, congratulates Mad Men for its Golden Globe win.
That’s because two Whedonverse stars are on the show. Vincent Kartheiser (Pete) was a major character (Connor) on Angel season 4 (and had guest appearances in season 5), and Christina Hendricks (Joan) had major guest shots on Firefly as Saffron, and a small (tiny) part in Angel season 1 as an Irish barmaid.
What Whedonesque failed to mention, but Roberta’s eagle eyes noticed, was Adam Kaufman, who played Bob Shaw, the air-conditioner salesman who penetrates Betty’s imagination in Indian Summer. He played heartbreaker Parker Abrams in Buffy’s fourth season.
Coolest of all to the lover of detail is Andy Umberger, who is Betty’s shrink, Dr. Wayne. He has appeared on all three of Joss Whedon’s series, on Buffy as D’Hoffryn, who is Demon in Charge of Vengeance Demons (a tough job with major seniority), on Angel as Dr. Ronald Meltzer (a seriously creepy one-off villain in season 1) and in a small role on Firefly as captain of the Dortmunder in the pilot.
November 15, 2007
We all know that there are some actors who are bad in many things, but sometimes great. Was Halle Berry the “best actress” of 2001? Not possible while people like Streep are alive and working. Did she give the best performance that year, in Monster’s Ball? Arguably yes.
Some actors are limited, and some are just uneven, but sometimes the director or the script brings something forth in that actor that had maybe been less visible. Those are inferior actors; if you need a good director to be good, isn’t that like, say, needing glasses to see? Isn’t your vision, by definition, inferior to those who don’t need the appliance?
Why do I bring this up? Two words: Vincent Kartheiser.
He was hateful and awful in Angel. He was the Wesley Crusher of that show. And now, as Pete Campbell, he’s kind of amazing. Now, maybe it’s that playing a petulant, pain-in-the-ass teenager is inherently less compelling than playing a petulant, pain-in-the-ass married adult. Or maybe the scripts here serve him better. Joss Whedon is known for bringing great performances out of so-so actors (not. naming. names.) but maybe in this case he fell down.
Or maybe Kartheiser is a bad actor in the right role.