One thing we haven’t gotten much of a look at is the women’s grooming process. We see them all look so perfect (or, occasionally not, like Carol the day she got fired and Francine freaking out over Carlton’s affairs).
For the most part all we see is the occasional lipstick application. But we don’t see what it takes to get Joan’s and Betty’s hair so flawless, or Helen Bishop’s face looking photo-ready.
Although as I write this, it occurs to me that neither do we ever see the meals being made. This, I believe, is quite deliberate. The women who do ‘nothing’ all day serve these multi-component meals. (Meat, potatoes, vegetables, probably salad and fresh-baked rolls and always dessert.) I am always aware of it. Especially in the case of Trudy, the newlywed, who may well spend the better part of her day planning and preparing Pete’s dinner (it takes awhile to get the rhythm, right?). Washing and ironing the tablecloth and napkins. And by the time he is home, she’s relaxed and ‘lovely’, but I bet that requires a full behind-the-scenes revamp.
So maybe it is Weiner’s intention that we never see it. Never see either; the grooming or the meals. The housework. Maybe the statement is that no one sees it. That it is so invisible and unappreciated that he can’t even bring himself to expose it.
Yet.
June 18, 2008 at 8:23 am
Marriage of Figaro had women in curlers preparing for the party later. And I believe we saw Helen prep before her big night out stuffing envelopes for Kennedy.
But you’re right, these women have maintenance rituals that must take HOURS.
June 18, 2008 at 8:27 am
Ooh, you might be right… Helen on the phone asking Betty to come babysit.
June 18, 2008 at 10:02 am
http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/f/images/femns_good.wife.1955.jpg
June 18, 2008 at 10:08 am
I think I got flagged trying to put the link up, so here’s what I meant to post …
The Good Wife’s Guide
From Housekeeping Monthly, 13 May, 1955.
- Have dinner ready. Plan ahead, even the night before, to have a delicious meal ready on time for his return. This is a way of letting him know that you have be thinking about him and are concerned about his needs. Most men are hungry when they get home and the prospect of a good meal is part of the warm welcome needed.
- Prepare yourself. Take 15 minutes to rest so you’ll be refreshed when he arrives. Touch up your make-up, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh-looking. He has just been with a lot of work-weary people.
- Be a little gay and a little more interesting for him. His boring day may need a lift and one of your duties is to provide it.
- Clear away the clutter. Make one last trip through the main part of the house just before your husband arrives. Run a dustcloth over the tables.
- During the cooler months of the year you should prepare and light a fire for him to unwind by. Your husband will feel he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give you a lift too. After all, catering to his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.
- Minimize all noise. At the time of his arrival, eliminate all noise of the washer, dryer or vacuum. Encourage the children to be quiet.
- Be happy to see him.
- Greet him with a warm smile and show sincerity in your desire to please him.
- Listen to him. You may have a dozen important things to tell him, but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first – remember, his topics of conversation are more important than yours.
- Don’t greet him with complaints and problems.
Don’t complain if he’s late for dinner or even if he stays out all night. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through at work.
- Make him comfortable. Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or lie him down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him.
Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low, soothing and pleasant voice.
Don’t ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity. Remember, he is the master of the house and as such will always exercise his will with fairness and truthfulness. You have no right to question him.
- A good wife always knows her place.
June 18, 2008 at 10:14 am
Well, now they’re both up.
I aspire to be that kind of wife. Or, I dunno, have one.
June 18, 2008 at 10:23 am
Dan, it sounds like a religion. Husband is God, wife is lowly human, worship him with fire and cool drinks.
June 18, 2008 at 10:31 am
right. and all I’m saying, nothing wrong with that.
June 18, 2008 at 10:31 am
Okay I’ll stop.
June 18, 2008 at 10:35 am
we report, you decide.
June 18, 2008 at 10:48 am
I think we got a glimpse of it with Betty, too, in Red in the Face. Sally’s running up and down the hall, Bobby’d just had his bath, Betty’s in curlers and half dressed, and Don calls to tell her Roger’s coming home with him. That was a pretty hectic moment. But then, we’ve also seen Betty in her negligee in the middle of the day, traipsing about as if she had nothing to do. We do know she has help, so maybe the bulk of her day is spent trying to look good for Don when he comes home in the evening. Ironic since half the time he doesn’t come home in the evening…
And then there’s Joan and Rachel. It must take weeks for them to get ready. The big, elaborate hair, the makeup, the foundation garments, the clothes, the accessories. How did they manage to do it every day and still get to work on time.
June 18, 2008 at 10:56 am
I’ve often thought about that too. Especially since I’ve been experimenting with vintage hairstyles myself for the past year or so.
We see Betty go to bed with not even a sleeping cap on to protect her hair and she wakes up the next morning with it looking as if she only had to run a comb through it to make it look perfect again. While Betty’s hairstyle looks very simple there’s quite a bit of work that goes into setting her hair.
I also wonder about Joan and Roger’s trysts. I believe some take place during the middle of the day (I could be remembering incorrectly), so how does Joan’s elaborate hairstyles hold up so well during the sex to be able to return to work afterward? And Roger has such a fetish for redheads that you’d think he’d be all about touching Joan’s hair. Though I suppose he’s probably been well trained by his wife after so many years to touch anything but the hair.
June 18, 2008 at 10:58 am
I see Betty’s negligee-traipsing as a sign of her depression.
June 18, 2008 at 11:00 am
Yes, Joan and Roger tryst by day. And I’m sure she too is well-skilled at not allowing her hair to be touched. But she also carries an overnight bag’s worth of stuff, and I’m sure a big-ass can of AquaNet is in there.
June 18, 2008 at 11:05 am
Wow, dans, that is really something. Reminds me of that old Bacharach tune, Wives and Lovers? I think my two favorite of those commandments are:
“Don’t complain if he’s late for dinner or even if he stays out all night. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through at work.
Don’t ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity. Remember, he is the master of the house and as such will always exercise his will with fairness and truthfulness. You have no right to question him.”
Question him, no but play him an Aretha Franklin song, yes: If you want a do right, home days woman, you gotta be a do right, home nights man.
June 18, 2008 at 11:06 am
Roberta, I was going to say the same thing about depression.
June 18, 2008 at 11:31 am
I prefer:
“After all, catering to his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.”
I’ve told my wife this a thousand times and I sense a little resistance. Maybe it’s my delivery.
June 18, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Is “catering to his comfort” an accepted euphemism for “blowjob,” or am I misreading that?
June 18, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Here’s a hint: ANYTHING is an accepted euphemism for ‘blowjob’.
June 18, 2008 at 1:48 pm
I knew that.
June 18, 2008 at 2:10 pm
It’s like, known.
June 18, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Silence is an accepted euphemism for it, too…
June 18, 2008 at 4:52 pm
This is my favorite comment thread EVER.
June 18, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Holy crap. the thing that Dan sent, the wife guidelines… the flipside of that is Pete and Peggy’s hunting fantasy. Eww eww ewwww!!!
June 18, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Agreed, funny thread indeed!
As an aside (but still very much related to sexism), I just wish there was an equivalent and equally ubiquitous term for “blowjob” in our culture for when women are on the ones on the receiving end. It would make things so much more fun.
I see Betty’s negligee-traipsing as a sign of her depression.
After viewing that half hour MM special, did anyone else feel that January Jones seemed to express a certain lack of insight into her character? She seemed to kind of write Betty off as a simpleton, whereas I think most of us here see her as having much more depth. Betty is an intelligent, educated woman who’s been shoved into this little box and is basically not allowed to express and explore any of her true self. And she’s stuck with a shrink (also a product of the times) who can’t or won’t see any of that as being a key part of her “problem”. Hell, that would make anyone depressed and out of sorts. Anyway, I only watched the MM special once, and maybe I need to watch it again. Perhaps Jones gave more credit to the Betty than I remember from first viewing.
I hope I haven’t ruined the thread too much.
June 18, 2008 at 5:25 pm
“I just wish there was an equivalent and equally ubiquitous term for “blowjob” in our culture for when women are on the ones on the receiving end. It would make things so much more fun.”
Couldn’t have said it better, OG.
June 18, 2008 at 5:44 pm
OG, I kind of agree that January Jones doesn’t appear to be quite as smart as Betty Draper, and she doesn’t seem to understand her character deeply.
Now, I’m surprised that Weiner doesn’t work more with his actors on their understanding, but if they deliver such amazing performances without it, maybe it’s better left alone.
I mean, she’s not the only one. Slattery said he was surprised to learn how vulnerable and insecure Roger was, I thought that was, y’know, information the actor might benefit from. But apparently, he’s doing great without it.
June 18, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Agreed, Deborah. Jones’ acting is perfect for that character. Perhaps it’s best she hasn’t thought about it too much because whatever she’s been doing (or not doing) is certainly working well. And yeah, I had the same reaction about Slattery’s remarks as you did. I guess it just goes to show actors are no different that the rest of the general population: not every river runs deep.
To all my “Basket” Lovelies (heh, heh! – that’s for the Pete Campbell fans!) and FWIW, I’m pretty much OK with any shortening of the name “Oaktown Girl” except “OG”. But I won’t scream if no one see this or if anyone forgets.
June 18, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Right. Don’t wanna be making you an original gangsta. Sorry. How about Oaktown?
June 18, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Hey, thanks for chiming in, hullaballoo!
For anyone who doesn’t want to type in the full name, Oaktown, Oaktown G, or yes, even O Girl or just about any other variation are all fine.
June 19, 2008 at 12:46 am
Ya know, many men still like their wives to be “a little gay.” Or so I’m told.
June 19, 2008 at 5:40 am
HAH!!
June 19, 2008 at 11:18 am
“Let him talk first – remember, his topics of conversation are more important than yours.
…
Don’t ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity.”
Oh really? I suppose that, in this light, Betty and Don’s relationship makes more sense to me. As a twenty-something college graduate with a full-time job who grew up in an era of outspoken feminism, though, it mostly just pisses me off. And I think that it’s that attitude that is causing Betty to feel such deep dissatisfaction. Subconsciously, Mrs. Draper seems to be ahead of her time in terms of gender roles, but she’s been conditioned by her society to accept and even want a second-class, subservient position. If that’s the case, I’m sure that her health problems are entirely psychosomatic. The question now is: can her male psychiatrist recognize the true cause of her neurosis and help her to take charge of her own life?
July 28, 2009 at 2:44 am
Hey – Back in the day the doctors were prescribing Secanol and Nembutol along with other tranquilizers. It was also fine to have a drink or three along with it. What the heck? You’re gonna have to listen to your husband tell you about his day whether you like it or not. I’d rather be doing it under the influence of that stuff! Now we’re stuck with antidepressants. Yuck.
June 19, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Re: January Jones:
Here’s my theory. I don’t think Jones is unintelligent. I think she feels that as an actor she needs the audience to know that she knows she’s playing Betty as directed: very little betrayal of emotion, that precise diction and formal inflection for the time period. As an actor, my guess is not that she’s resentful or disagrees with the portrayal required of her, but perhaps she thinks letting loose with Big Drama would be a Whole Lot Funner. So, feeling that way might in fact be a reflection of intelligence (or lack thereof), but maybe the way she sort of apologizes for her interpretation of the character is more out of insecurity and wanting the public to know she can also ACT.
Or maybe I’m theorizing out of my butt.
At any rate, I adore Betty Draper. I’m going to print out that list from Good Housekeeping and go give it to my husband. Hoo-hah!
June 19, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Debra, that is a slammin’ interpretation!
June 19, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Why thanks, I’m so flattered!
June 20, 2008 at 2:32 am
I have a weakness for commentary tracks, which is one of the reasons I’m excited about getting my MM DVDs. The downside to this is sometimes you find out actors — and directors — are real twits.
June 26, 2008 at 3:50 am
I’ve talked to January a couple of times (a few years ago, before this series started). When I spoke to her in person I was incredibly impressed by her. She was very intelligent, funny, easy to talk to, unassuming. Whenever I’ve seen or read an interview of her, she’s rarely come across the same way. She seems self-conscious and nervous in interviews to me.
On the subject of clothing, she has always worn unusual outfits. She says she likes to be ‘edgy’, but it seems to me that many of her outfits are costume-like or otherwise non-traditional . It’s interesting to me that the critics keep judging her as if she’s going for traditional beauty and missing the mark rather than realizing that she may be dressing the way she is for her own fun. Oh well, I guess it’s their job to judge. For me, I’m tired of trend.
June 26, 2008 at 5:52 am
GMW, that’s interesting to know about her.
And it is hard to be fashionably ‘different’ in Hollywood, no doubt. But sorry, she’s fug’d. Not because the outfits are non-traditional, but because they’re non-… pretty.
June 26, 2008 at 8:35 am
If you go for “edgy,” you’re going to make mistakes sometimes. She likes satin, and that tends to photograph poorly and to wrinkle. She likes very short skirts, and she’s gorgeous and has great legs, but you wouldn’t put “leggy” first when describing her beauty, and I think she detracts rather than adds to her beauty by putting all the emphasis there.
Still, if she’s having fun, go for it. One thing about the Fug Girls, they often really enjoy the craziest perpetrators of Fug looks; they worship Bai Ling and Sharon Stone. If you want to dress crazy, do it with aplomb!
June 26, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Minis are very hard to pull off when A) you’re a grownup and B) they are not in fashion. It’s a rough combination.
Deb pointed out to me that I can sort of pull them off (even though I’m terribly, terribly old) because I’m terribly, terribly short. Particularly short-legged. So it kind of works.
Did I mention this here? Or just out loud… to me, her outfit is reminiscent of the designer piece in Shoot. Which was also kind of fug, but such an innovation for the times.