So I posted about the naming of Don Draper. (Mr. Weiner has not called to confirm my theory, but he will, I’m sure. Call me, k?)
Well within an hour of this revelation, (I kid you not, within an hour!) I get an email from our very own wisefish (whose comments were always inexplicably visiting our spam-catcher first before being rescued but now it’s finally better), talking about the possible origins of Dick Whitman’s name.
From her email to me:
Have you heard of the folk tale of Dick Whittington and His Cat?
My husband just started reading From Here to Eternity and read a reference to someone being … “a sort of Dick Whittington with a bandanna tied to a stick but no cat.”
Not being familiar with the Dick Whittington reference, he Googled it and found the folk tale I linked to above.
I would dare say that Matthew Weiner is familiar with Dick Whittington and His Cat. He sounds a lot like Dick Whitman/Don Draper!
Okay, that pretty much was her email to me.
So I check out the folk tale. Orphan boy (with a bandanna tied to a stick; I love it) eventually gets rich. Works for me.
I know that Weiner also spoke about how he’d always planned for this sort of Huck Finn (or Tom Sawyer?) thing, in reference to Don’s bringing Dick’s body back on the train. (or, Dick bringing Don’s body back.) I never read either of them, but I know that the kids attend their own funeral in Tom Sawyer, and then reveal that they are alive, and in Huck Finn he fakes his own murder in order to escape from his abusive father, and that has him head down the Mississippi. My guess is that it is the Huck scenario that Weiner alludes to. Anyone who actually read it, please feel free to chime in and help me out here.
June 3, 2008 at 8:37 am
Within an hour? Really?!? Weird!
June 3, 2008 at 8:40 am
I KNOW!!!
Deb can vouch for me.
June 3, 2008 at 8:53 am
You guys are amazing. Awesome research.
June 3, 2008 at 9:00 am
I was sitting right there.
Right. There.
June 3, 2008 at 9:35 am
Don as Huck is an interesting idea. Huck was the abused son of the town drunk, who does, indeed, fake his own death in order to escape. So far, so familiar. Huck even assumes fake identities on his trip down river (at one point he masquerades as Tom Sawyer). The difference is that Huck never wants wealth or status or to fit in with normal society. At the end he plans to “light out for the territory,” where Don heads East to the city.
Don as Gatsby works better.
June 3, 2008 at 9:45 am
But Don does have this other side, this other set of dreams. As crass as he was with the Beat crowd, he also was very clear in Shoot that advertising is not where his dreams end. That screamed to me of a kind of freedom that was not associated with money.
June 3, 2008 at 2:08 pm
And wasn’t Huck the original hobo, really?
So Don represents civilization, the status quo, the family man, society’s restrictions and Dick represents the free-spirit, the orphan, the independent hobo who lives outside of society’s rules.
June 3, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Gatsby and Huck are both classic American archetypes, and they both apply equally to Don Draper/Dick Whitman. Don Draper = Jay Gatsby, whereas Dick Whitman = Huckleberry Finn. I think Don might be trying to fuse the two personas, but in reality he may have to choose.
June 3, 2008 at 3:00 pm
I think “the original” may be pushing, although the original American hobo is an argument that could be made. The Dick Whittington story tells us how old that archetype is, which hints at its power.
June 3, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Good point. sigh. I am so inexact today. Can I blame it on Mercury Retrograde?
June 3, 2008 at 4:36 pm
You can blame anything on Mercury Retrograde, that’s the beauty of it. The other day, my son blamed bad driving on Mercury Retrograde.