<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Men don&#8217;t like Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/</link>
	<description>The unofficial blog of AMC's Mad Men</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefreedictionary.com/whacky&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acceptable variant&lt;/a&gt;. I looked it up when I created a &quot;Wacky Media&quot; category on the &lt;a&gt;Bond Blog&lt;/a&gt;. I started as &quot;Whacky Media&quot; then I switched and I&#039;m not sure if I switched back. I know &quot;wacky&quot; is more correct but it looks funny to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/whacky" rel="nofollow">acceptable variant</a>. I looked it up when I created a &#8220;Wacky Media&#8221; category on the <a>Bond Blog</a>. I started as &#8220;Whacky Media&#8221; then I switched and I&#8217;m not sure if I switched back. I know &#8220;wacky&#8221; is more correct but it looks funny to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think wacky has an h. Even wen it&#039;s a whacky coven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think wacky has an h. Even wen it&#8217;s a whacky coven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I could have costumes. I could change from Bond girl to witch to corporate personage. And I have a whacky kid and whacky coworkers and a whacky coven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could have costumes. I could change from Bond girl to witch to corporate personage. And I have a whacky kid and whacky coworkers and a whacky coven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Deborah, you should consider writing a show about yourself, then!  A show about a Bond obsessed, non-fiction and tech writing witch would be something I would want to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah, you should consider writing a show about yourself, then!  A show about a Bond obsessed, non-fiction and tech writing witch would be something I would want to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>maurinsky, I never see me on TV. No tech writers. No non-fiction authors. No witches. They should totally make a show about me, I&#039;m interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maurinsky, I never see me on TV. No tech writers. No non-fiction authors. No witches. They should totally make a show about me, I&#8217;m interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>It just didn&#039;t hold my interest (Studio) and I was all excited about it. The funny moments in West Wing were stunning. This had a similar rhythm (or it did for me) which felt all wrong for a show about a comedy. I wanted to laugh more. I couldn&#039;t get close enough to find out more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just didn&#8217;t hold my interest (Studio) and I was all excited about it. The funny moments in West Wing were stunning. This had a similar rhythm (or it did for me) which felt all wrong for a show about a comedy. I wanted to laugh more. I couldn&#8217;t get close enough to find out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I would complain about how my profession is portrayed on TV, but rarely do I see a mid-level wage slave/secretary/purchasing agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would complain about how my profession is portrayed on TV, but rarely do I see a mid-level wage slave/secretary/purchasing agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wasn&#039;t talking about you personally, I mean the overall inability of the show to gain buzz, despite the fact that it improved with time (after the pilot it definitely slagged off, then picked up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wasn&#8217;t talking about you personally, I mean the overall inability of the show to gain buzz, despite the fact that it improved with time (after the pilot it definitely slagged off, then picked up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>But Deborah - all the press I read before Studio 60 aired was positive. And I thought the pilot was very good. I won&#039;t ask you to justify anything because taste is always highly subjective, but I don&#039;t think I was influenced to dislike the show based on negative reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Deborah &#8211; all the press I read before Studio 60 aired was positive. And I thought the pilot was very good. I won&#8217;t ask you to justify anything because taste is always highly subjective, but I don&#8217;t think I was influenced to dislike the show based on negative reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I can justify my love of Studio 60, a lot of people didn&#039;t like it, although Arthur and I adored it. But the bad word of mouth at the outset could certainly have been influenced by the population in the way I described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I can justify my love of Studio 60, a lot of people didn&#8217;t like it, although Arthur and I adored it. But the bad word of mouth at the outset could certainly have been influenced by the population in the way I described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
